Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies

Includes bibliographical references.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kershoff, Marko Daniel
Other Authors: Yeats, Jacqueline
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Commercial Law 2015
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613262892236800
access_status_str Open Access
author Kershoff, Marko Daniel
author2 Yeats, Jacqueline
author_browse Kershoff, Marko Daniel
Yeats, Jacqueline
author_facet Yeats, Jacqueline
Kershoff, Marko Daniel
author_sort Kershoff, Marko Daniel
collection Thesis
description Includes bibliographical references.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/12900
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:21.255Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2015
publishDateRange 2015
publishDateSort 2015
publisher Department of Commercial Law
publisherStr Department of Commercial Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/12900 The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies Kershoff, Marko Daniel Yeats, Jacqueline Commercial Law Includes bibliographical references. The triangular merger structures provide an innovative and effective method for avoiding the voting and concomitant appraisal rights of a holding company’s shareholders. This is because, by incorporating and making use of a wholly owned subsidiary company to effect the proposed transaction, the holding company is deemed not to be a party to the amalgamation or merger agreement; even though the transaction is instigated and financed by it. Importantly, and as a result of the fact that the holding company is able to distance itself from the transaction, its shareholders are deprived of their voting and appraisal rights, thereby allowing said company to effectively avoid the usual cash drain resulting from the exercise of shareholder appraisal rights. It is argued that companies must not be allowed to make use of and exploit the separate legal personality of a shell subsidiary company solely to circumvent the rights of their shareholders. Failing specific legislative intervention to curtail this potential abuse, shareholders of the holding company ought to be able to successfully challenge the implementation of a triangular merger by (i) applying to court in terms of s 20(9) of the Act (the theory behind this being that the triangular merger structures propose the use of a separate legal entity as a device or stratagem to defeat their rights); and/or (ii) filing a complaint with the relevant statutory body citing the provisions of s 115(4) of the Act. In either case, and as an alternative submission, shareholders can also argue that such conduct falls within the parameters of the statutory oppression remedy. 2015-05-27T04:07:19Z 2015-05-27T04:07:19Z 2014 Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12900 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Commercial Law
Kershoff, Marko Daniel
The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies
title_full The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies
title_fullStr The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies
title_full_unstemmed The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies
title_short The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies
title_sort triangular merger structures the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies
topic Commercial Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12900
work_keys_str_mv AT kershoffmarkodaniel thetriangularmergerstructurestheuseoftheforwardandreversetriangularmergerstructurestocircumventthevotingandappraisalrightsofminorityshareholdersandpotentialshareholderremedies
AT kershoffmarkodaniel triangularmergerstructurestheuseoftheforwardandreversetriangularmergerstructurestocircumventthevotingandappraisalrightsofminorityshareholdersandpotentialshareholderremedies