Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Prior research shows that accurate interviewers have higher ‘dispositional reasoning’, defined as the ability to understand the relationship between personality, behaviour and situations. Drawing on schema theory, the present study attempted to determine if dispositional reasoning could be developed...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Organisational Psychology
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613232916594688 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Hall, Jonathan |
| author2 | De Kock, Francois |
| author_browse | De Kock, Francois Hall, Jonathan |
| author_facet | De Kock, Francois Hall, Jonathan |
| author_sort | Hall, Jonathan |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Prior research shows that accurate interviewers have higher ‘dispositional reasoning’, defined as the ability to understand the relationship between personality, behaviour and situations. Drawing on schema theory, the present study attempted to determine if dispositional reasoning could be developed in students who participated in interview training. We used two different experiments to assess the relative effectiveness of two different training approaches to enhance the subcomponents of dispositional reasoning: trait induction, trait extrapolation and trait contextualisation. Our first experiment used traditional frame-ofreference (FOR) training in an attempt to develop dispositional reasoning. In a second experiment, we developed schema-feedback training, a novel approach to training dispositional reasoning that is based on the use of schema refinement through feedback. We found that neither approach had an effect on the participants’ dispositional reasoning component scores when compared to a ‘no-training’ comparison group. The low statistical power (due to a relatively small sample size) was a limitation in this study. Further research is necessary to determine the malleability of interviewers’ dispositional reasoning. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13673 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:32:52.713Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateRange | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Organisational Psychology |
| publisherStr | Organisational Psychology |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/13673 The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training Hall, Jonathan De Kock, Francois Organisational Psychology Prior research shows that accurate interviewers have higher ‘dispositional reasoning’, defined as the ability to understand the relationship between personality, behaviour and situations. Drawing on schema theory, the present study attempted to determine if dispositional reasoning could be developed in students who participated in interview training. We used two different experiments to assess the relative effectiveness of two different training approaches to enhance the subcomponents of dispositional reasoning: trait induction, trait extrapolation and trait contextualisation. Our first experiment used traditional frame-ofreference (FOR) training in an attempt to develop dispositional reasoning. In a second experiment, we developed schema-feedback training, a novel approach to training dispositional reasoning that is based on the use of schema refinement through feedback. We found that neither approach had an effect on the participants’ dispositional reasoning component scores when compared to a ‘no-training’ comparison group. The low statistical power (due to a relatively small sample size) was a limitation in this study. Further research is necessary to determine the malleability of interviewers’ dispositional reasoning. 2015-08-10T06:42:23Z 2015-08-10T06:42:23Z 2015 Master Thesis Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13673 eng application/pdf Organisational Psychology Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | Organisational Psychology Hall, Jonathan The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training |
| title_full | The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training |
| title_fullStr | The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training |
| title_full_unstemmed | The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training |
| title_short | The effect of schema-based training on dispositional reasoning components : comparing frame-of-reference training and schema-feedback training |
| title_sort | effect of schema based training on dispositional reasoning components comparing frame of reference training and schema feedback training |
| topic | Organisational Psychology |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/13673 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT halljonathan theeffectofschemabasedtrainingondispositionalreasoningcomponentscomparingframeofreferencetrainingandschemafeedbacktraining AT halljonathan effectofschemabasedtrainingondispositionalreasoningcomponentscomparingframeofreferencetrainingandschemafeedbacktraining |