Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
While the identification of the carrier under a contract for the carriage of goods by sea, whether as unimodal transport or as a leg of a multimodal transport, for the purposes of determining the person liable for the loss or the damage to goods carried, does not generally present a cargo interest w...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Shipping Law Unit
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | While the identification of the carrier under a contract for the carriage of goods by sea, whether as unimodal transport or as a leg of a multimodal transport, for the purposes of determining the person liable for the loss or the damage to goods carried, does not generally present a cargo interest with difficulties, there are instances in which it may do so. This minor dissertation evaluates the solutions provided by the Rotterdam Rules to certain 'identity of the carrier problems'. |
|---|