Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Access to the practice of a profession is controlled by formal education structures. These structures are intended to induct future professionals into the specialised knowledge, skills and values that underpin that profession. Yet, despite meeting the academic requirements of a professional degree,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
School of Education
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613589243691008 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Wolmarans, Nicolette Sarah |
| author_browse | Wolmarans, Nicolette Sarah |
| author_facet | Wolmarans, Nicolette Sarah |
| author_sort | Wolmarans, Nicolette Sarah |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Access to the practice of a profession is controlled by formal education structures. These structures are intended to induct future professionals into the specialised knowledge, skills and values that underpin that profession. Yet, despite meeting the academic requirements of a professional degree, many graduates struggle to 'apply' specialised knowledge when confronted with problems in professional practice. This is a study of the nature of knowledge as it is mobilised in professional reasoning. The case studied was located in engineering education, because knowledge relations tend to be more explicit in education than in practice. The data were collected from design projects located in two differently structured curricula in civil and mechanical engineering curricula. The research questions that directed the study were: 1. What is the nature of the reasoning involved when specialised disciplinary knowledge is recruited to develop specific, often concrete, artefacts? 2. What is the logic of progression in a trajectory of engineering design tasks in terms of the relation between knowledge and artefact? The study draws on two intellectual fields: models of professional reasoning and design thinking on one hand, and social realism in the sociology of education on the other. These traditions take different positions on professional reasoning. Design thinking is concerned with contextual detail and case precedent, while social realism in the sociology of education is concerned with conceptual coherence within knowledge specialisations and the power of generalisation. Both offer important insights into professional reasoning, but alone neither is adequate. The analysis was done using the semantics dimension of Legitimation Code Theory, LCT (Semantics), which required an adaptation in order to fully describe the significance of contextual detail evident in the data. The findings showed that specialised knowledge and contextual detail interact far more dialectically than previously assumed. This provides empirical insights for structuring curricula. Students can be more intentionally inducted into recontextualising academic knowledge for the purpose of solving contextually emergent problems. Theoretically the study contributes to the social realist school within the sociology of education by revealing its blindness to contextual detail and consequently offering a fuller understanding of the nature of regions. This has implications for other studies of professional knowledge and education. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/25654 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:38:33.033Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateRange | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | School of Education |
| publisherStr | School of Education |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/25654 The nature of professional reasoning: An analysis of design in the engineering curriculum Wolmarans, Nicolette Sarah Curriculum Studies Access to the practice of a profession is controlled by formal education structures. These structures are intended to induct future professionals into the specialised knowledge, skills and values that underpin that profession. Yet, despite meeting the academic requirements of a professional degree, many graduates struggle to 'apply' specialised knowledge when confronted with problems in professional practice. This is a study of the nature of knowledge as it is mobilised in professional reasoning. The case studied was located in engineering education, because knowledge relations tend to be more explicit in education than in practice. The data were collected from design projects located in two differently structured curricula in civil and mechanical engineering curricula. The research questions that directed the study were: 1. What is the nature of the reasoning involved when specialised disciplinary knowledge is recruited to develop specific, often concrete, artefacts? 2. What is the logic of progression in a trajectory of engineering design tasks in terms of the relation between knowledge and artefact? The study draws on two intellectual fields: models of professional reasoning and design thinking on one hand, and social realism in the sociology of education on the other. These traditions take different positions on professional reasoning. Design thinking is concerned with contextual detail and case precedent, while social realism in the sociology of education is concerned with conceptual coherence within knowledge specialisations and the power of generalisation. Both offer important insights into professional reasoning, but alone neither is adequate. The analysis was done using the semantics dimension of Legitimation Code Theory, LCT (Semantics), which required an adaptation in order to fully describe the significance of contextual detail evident in the data. The findings showed that specialised knowledge and contextual detail interact far more dialectically than previously assumed. This provides empirical insights for structuring curricula. Students can be more intentionally inducted into recontextualising academic knowledge for the purpose of solving contextually emergent problems. Theoretically the study contributes to the social realist school within the sociology of education by revealing its blindness to contextual detail and consequently offering a fuller understanding of the nature of regions. This has implications for other studies of professional knowledge and education. 2017-10-12T14:06:47Z 2017-10-12T14:06:47Z 2017 Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25654 eng application/pdf School of Education Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | Curriculum Studies Wolmarans, Nicolette Sarah The nature of professional reasoning: An analysis of design in the engineering curriculum |
| thesis_degree_str | Doctoral |
| title | The nature of professional reasoning: An analysis of design in the engineering curriculum |
| title_full | The nature of professional reasoning: An analysis of design in the engineering curriculum |
| title_fullStr | The nature of professional reasoning: An analysis of design in the engineering curriculum |
| title_full_unstemmed | The nature of professional reasoning: An analysis of design in the engineering curriculum |
| title_short | The nature of professional reasoning: An analysis of design in the engineering curriculum |
| title_sort | nature of professional reasoning an analysis of design in the engineering curriculum |
| topic | Curriculum Studies |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25654 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wolmaransnicolettesarah thenatureofprofessionalreasoningananalysisofdesignintheengineeringcurriculum AT wolmaransnicolettesarah natureofprofessionalreasoningananalysisofdesignintheengineeringcurriculum |