Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Ependymal tumours in childhood: outcomes and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively review the patient demographics, disease profile and treatment outcomes of paediatric patients treated for ependymoma at our institution. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: 51 eligible patients were treated between 1980 and 2013. The median age at presentation was 6 years. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nkosi, Zanele
Other Authors: Parkes, Jeannette
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Division of Radiation Oncology 2018
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively review the patient demographics, disease profile and treatment outcomes of paediatric patients treated for ependymoma at our institution. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: 51 eligible patients were treated between 1980 and 2013. The median age at presentation was 6 years. The majority of patients were male (66,7%), had infratentorial tumours (62,7%) and had low-grade tumours (70,6%). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 22 patients (43,1%). Thirtyeight patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (76,5%) and 10 (19,6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 63,3 % (median follow up of 46 months). The 5 year progression free survival (PFS) was 50,70%. Seventeen (33,3%) patients experienced treatment failure, of which 13 (76,5%) represented local failure. The median time to first relapse was 20 months. The 5 year PFS for children > 3 was 50,0 % and 27,7% for children ≤ 3 years of age (p = 0.0356). GTR had a superior 5- year OS of 73,9% over subtotal resection with a value of 56,7% (p = 0.0016). Similarly an improved 5-year PFS of 70,3% versus 29,1% was observed with GTR over subtotal resection (p = <0.0001). Patients who received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) had significantly better outcomes than those in whom RT was not given (p = <0.0001, 5 year OS of 69,7% versus 37,5%). CONCLUSION: This review confirms the finding that GTR is associated with improved outcomes and that adjuvant radiation therapy positively impacts survival. The worse outcomes in the younger age group requires further evaluation and possible change in treatment protocol for this group of patients.