Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Stature estimation: evaluating regression equations for different population groups in South Africa

Stature estimations from regression formulae are used by forensic anthropologists in constructing a biological profile from unidentified human remains. Regression formulae are used to calculate total skeletal height or living stature when incomplete, fragmentary or burned human remains are recovered...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arendse, Liesl Margo
Other Authors: Friedling, Louise J
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Human Biology 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613190182928384
access_status_str Open Access
author Arendse, Liesl Margo
author2 Friedling, Louise J
author_browse Arendse, Liesl Margo
Friedling, Louise J
author_facet Friedling, Louise J
Arendse, Liesl Margo
author_sort Arendse, Liesl Margo
collection Thesis
description Stature estimations from regression formulae are used by forensic anthropologists in constructing a biological profile from unidentified human remains. Regression formulae are used to calculate total skeletal height or living stature when incomplete, fragmentary or burned human remains are recovered. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the total skeletal height regression formulae from (1) Lundy and Feldesman (1987), and (2) Dayal et al. (2008) when compared to total skeletal height from the full anatomical method (Fully’s method), in a contemporary South African population. The use of these regression formulae to estimate total skeletal height of South Africans of Mixed Ancestry was investigated as no population-specific standards exist for this group. Additionally, the reliability of the generic femur/stature ratio (Feldesman et al., 1990) to estimate living stature for all three population groups was investigated. Measurements were taken from 229 individuals comprising of South Africans of Mixed Ancestry, African Descent and European Descent from South African skeletal collections. ANOVA’s and paired t-tests were used to determined if there was a significant difference (p<0.05) between (1) estimated total skeletal height from regression formulae and that from Fully’s method, and (2) the estimated living stature from the femur/stature ratio and a calculated living stature from Fully’s total skeletal height with soft tissue and age correction factors. No significant difference (p>0.05) was found between South Africans of African Descent and Mixed Ancestry’s calculated total skeletal height, but both were significantly different (p<0.000) to individuals of European Descent. Results indicate that the Lundy and Feldesman (1987) regression formulae should be re-assessed for contemporary South Africans of African Descent and results from the Dayal et al. (2008) regression formulae indicate that the formulae are still relevant for contemporary South Africans of European Descent. Additionally, new regression formulae should be developed to enable forensic or physical anthropologists to estimate total skeletal height of Mixed Ancestry individuals. The femur/stature ratio’s living stature were significantly different (p<0.000) from the calculated living stature, and generally overestimated it for maximum femur lengths greater than 50cm.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29177
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:12.136Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Department of Human Biology
publisherStr Department of Human Biology
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29177 Stature estimation: evaluating regression equations for different population groups in South Africa Arendse, Liesl Margo Friedling, Louise J Anatomy Stature estimations from regression formulae are used by forensic anthropologists in constructing a biological profile from unidentified human remains. Regression formulae are used to calculate total skeletal height or living stature when incomplete, fragmentary or burned human remains are recovered. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the total skeletal height regression formulae from (1) Lundy and Feldesman (1987), and (2) Dayal et al. (2008) when compared to total skeletal height from the full anatomical method (Fully’s method), in a contemporary South African population. The use of these regression formulae to estimate total skeletal height of South Africans of Mixed Ancestry was investigated as no population-specific standards exist for this group. Additionally, the reliability of the generic femur/stature ratio (Feldesman et al., 1990) to estimate living stature for all three population groups was investigated. Measurements were taken from 229 individuals comprising of South Africans of Mixed Ancestry, African Descent and European Descent from South African skeletal collections. ANOVA’s and paired t-tests were used to determined if there was a significant difference (p<0.05) between (1) estimated total skeletal height from regression formulae and that from Fully’s method, and (2) the estimated living stature from the femur/stature ratio and a calculated living stature from Fully’s total skeletal height with soft tissue and age correction factors. No significant difference (p>0.05) was found between South Africans of African Descent and Mixed Ancestry’s calculated total skeletal height, but both were significantly different (p<0.000) to individuals of European Descent. Results indicate that the Lundy and Feldesman (1987) regression formulae should be re-assessed for contemporary South Africans of African Descent and results from the Dayal et al. (2008) regression formulae indicate that the formulae are still relevant for contemporary South Africans of European Descent. Additionally, new regression formulae should be developed to enable forensic or physical anthropologists to estimate total skeletal height of Mixed Ancestry individuals. The femur/stature ratio’s living stature were significantly different (p<0.000) from the calculated living stature, and generally overestimated it for maximum femur lengths greater than 50cm. 2019-01-30T06:14:05Z 2019-01-30T06:14:05Z 2018 2019-01-25T10:28:50Z Master Thesis Masters MSc (Med) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29177 eng application/pdf Department of Human Biology Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Anatomy
Arendse, Liesl Margo
Stature estimation: evaluating regression equations for different population groups in South Africa
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Stature estimation: evaluating regression equations for different population groups in South Africa
title_full Stature estimation: evaluating regression equations for different population groups in South Africa
title_fullStr Stature estimation: evaluating regression equations for different population groups in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Stature estimation: evaluating regression equations for different population groups in South Africa
title_short Stature estimation: evaluating regression equations for different population groups in South Africa
title_sort stature estimation evaluating regression equations for different population groups in south africa
topic Anatomy
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29177
work_keys_str_mv AT arendselieslmargo statureestimationevaluatingregressionequationsfordifferentpopulationgroupsinsouthafrica