Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Persistent yellow fever endemicity and continued outbreaks have continued to increase vaccine demand, while straining global vaccine supply. Fractional dose vaccination is being considered as a dose-sparing strategy to mitigate current global vaccine shortages. This study therefore assessed the effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nnaji, Chukwudi Arnest
Other Authors: Wiysonge, Charles S
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Health and Family Medicine 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613183552782336
access_status_str Open Access
author Nnaji, Chukwudi Arnest
author2 Wiysonge, Charles S
author_browse Nnaji, Chukwudi Arnest
Wiysonge, Charles S
author_facet Wiysonge, Charles S
Nnaji, Chukwudi Arnest
author_sort Nnaji, Chukwudi Arnest
collection Thesis
description Persistent yellow fever endemicity and continued outbreaks have continued to increase vaccine demand, while straining global vaccine supply. Fractional dose vaccination is being considered as a dose-sparing strategy to mitigate current global vaccine shortages. This study therefore assessed the effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination, in comparison to those of the standard dose. We registered the review in the prospective register of systematic reviews; conducted a comprehensive search of published and grey literature; used standard Cochrane methods to collect and synthesise the evidence and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidance. We stratified analyses by the strength of the fractional dose. We retrieved 2495 records from the literature search, nine of them potentially eligible. We included six eligible studies (three randomised and three quasi-randomised trials), with 2371 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in immunogenicity between participants who received fractional doses containing one-third (two trials, 547 participants: RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04; I2 = 0%), 1/5th (one trial, 155 participants: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.03), 1/10th (four trials, 890 participants: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01, I 2 = 0%), and 1/50th (three trials, 661 participants: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.02, I2 = 72%) of the standard dose and those who received the full standard dose. However, immunogenicity was significantly lower among participants who received fractional doses containing 1/100th (four trials, 868 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97, I2 = 60%) and < 1/100th (five trials, 1053 participants; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.64, I2= 98%) of the standard dose compared to participants who received the full standard dose. Minor adverse events following vaccination did not differ across doses, but no serious adverse events were reported in any study arm. The combined data provide moderate certainty evidence that there is little or no difference in immunogenicity between ≥1/50th fractional doses and the standard dose of yellow fever vaccines. However, these studies were of short duration ranging from four weeks to a year. These findings support the use of fractional dose vaccination as a dose-sparing strategy for yellow fever vaccination.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29303
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:06.010Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher Department of Public Health and Family Medicine
publisherStr Department of Public Health and Family Medicine
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29303 Effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis Nnaji, Chukwudi Arnest Wiysonge, Charles S Shey, Muki S Adetokunboh, Olatunji O Medicine Persistent yellow fever endemicity and continued outbreaks have continued to increase vaccine demand, while straining global vaccine supply. Fractional dose vaccination is being considered as a dose-sparing strategy to mitigate current global vaccine shortages. This study therefore assessed the effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination, in comparison to those of the standard dose. We registered the review in the prospective register of systematic reviews; conducted a comprehensive search of published and grey literature; used standard Cochrane methods to collect and synthesise the evidence and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidance. We stratified analyses by the strength of the fractional dose. We retrieved 2495 records from the literature search, nine of them potentially eligible. We included six eligible studies (three randomised and three quasi-randomised trials), with 2371 participants. There was no statistically significant difference in immunogenicity between participants who received fractional doses containing one-third (two trials, 547 participants: RR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.04; I2 = 0%), 1/5th (one trial, 155 participants: RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.03), 1/10th (four trials, 890 participants: RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.01, I 2 = 0%), and 1/50th (three trials, 661 participants: RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.02, I2 = 72%) of the standard dose and those who received the full standard dose. However, immunogenicity was significantly lower among participants who received fractional doses containing 1/100th (four trials, 868 participants: RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97, I2 = 60%) and < 1/100th (five trials, 1053 participants; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.64, I2= 98%) of the standard dose compared to participants who received the full standard dose. Minor adverse events following vaccination did not differ across doses, but no serious adverse events were reported in any study arm. The combined data provide moderate certainty evidence that there is little or no difference in immunogenicity between ≥1/50th fractional doses and the standard dose of yellow fever vaccines. However, these studies were of short duration ranging from four weeks to a year. These findings support the use of fractional dose vaccination as a dose-sparing strategy for yellow fever vaccination. 2019-02-05T07:11:33Z 2019-02-05T07:11:33Z 2018 2019-01-31T09:54:48Z Master Thesis Masters MPH http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29303 eng application/pdf Department of Public Health and Family Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Medicine
Nnaji, Chukwudi Arnest
Effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effects of fractional dose yellow fever vaccination a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Medicine
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29303
work_keys_str_mv AT nnajichukwudiarnest effectsoffractionaldoseyellowfevervaccinationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis