Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Collaboration networks in economic science

When preparing a research article, Economists receive feedback from other academics, present on conference and give talks in seminars. This form of collaboration is termed informal because informal collaborators have, unlike authors, no formal property rights associated with their contribution. Howe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rose, Michael E
Other Authors: Georg, Co-Pierre
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: School of Economics 2019
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613297976541184
access_status_str Open Access
author Rose, Michael E
author2 Georg, Co-Pierre
author_browse Georg, Co-Pierre
Rose, Michael E
author_facet Georg, Co-Pierre
Rose, Michael E
author_sort Rose, Michael E
collection Thesis
description When preparing a research article, Economists receive feedback from other academics, present on conference and give talks in seminars. This form of collaboration is termed informal because informal collaborators have, unlike authors, no formal property rights associated with their contribution. However, informal collaboration is so widespread that it appears to be part of the academic production function. Yet, it has received little attention in academia, least in Economics where patterns of informal collaboration differ from that of natural sciences. Social informal collaboration, the provision of direct feedback, gives rise to a social network. This thesis examines this network. The analysis focuses on the role of individual scientists in the network, which is estimated by different network centralities. Data originate from about 6000 published research articles from six Financial Economics journals between 1997 and 2011. A theoretical model describes how network centrality proxies the effort informal collaborators exert informally in a project, and how this improves the citation count of the research paper. We then investigate how observable characteristics of authors determine this and other centrality measures and find that common metrics such as productivity and number of citations correlate little with network centrality. As information transmission is an important aspect of social networks we study how network centrality of Economists relates to placement outcomes of their students in the academic job market. These findings suggest that even informal networks matter in the production of academic research; that these networks contain information above currently used measures of scholarly influence in the profession; and that these networks are used to decrease information asymmetry in the academic labor market.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29857
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:54.099Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2019
publishDateRange 2019
publishDateSort 2019
publisher School of Economics
publisherStr School of Economics
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/29857 Collaboration networks in economic science Rose, Michael E Georg, Co-Pierre Taylor, David Economics When preparing a research article, Economists receive feedback from other academics, present on conference and give talks in seminars. This form of collaboration is termed informal because informal collaborators have, unlike authors, no formal property rights associated with their contribution. However, informal collaboration is so widespread that it appears to be part of the academic production function. Yet, it has received little attention in academia, least in Economics where patterns of informal collaboration differ from that of natural sciences. Social informal collaboration, the provision of direct feedback, gives rise to a social network. This thesis examines this network. The analysis focuses on the role of individual scientists in the network, which is estimated by different network centralities. Data originate from about 6000 published research articles from six Financial Economics journals between 1997 and 2011. A theoretical model describes how network centrality proxies the effort informal collaborators exert informally in a project, and how this improves the citation count of the research paper. We then investigate how observable characteristics of authors determine this and other centrality measures and find that common metrics such as productivity and number of citations correlate little with network centrality. As information transmission is an important aspect of social networks we study how network centrality of Economists relates to placement outcomes of their students in the academic job market. These findings suggest that even informal networks matter in the production of academic research; that these networks contain information above currently used measures of scholarly influence in the profession; and that these networks are used to decrease information asymmetry in the academic labor market. 2019-03-01T06:52:38Z 2019-03-01T06:52:38Z 2018 2019-02-25T10:55:09Z Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29857 eng application/pdf School of Economics Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Economics
Rose, Michael E
Collaboration networks in economic science
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Collaboration networks in economic science
title_full Collaboration networks in economic science
title_fullStr Collaboration networks in economic science
title_full_unstemmed Collaboration networks in economic science
title_short Collaboration networks in economic science
title_sort collaboration networks in economic science
topic Economics
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29857
work_keys_str_mv AT rosemichaele collaborationnetworksineconomicscience