Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Market solutions to the low-income housing challenge – a case study of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe

The provision of decent, affordable and well-located housing for low-income communities has been an intractable problem, especially for developing countries. The empirical puzzle that motivated this study is that, despite the adverse macro environment in Zimbabwe, there appears to be private-sector...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taruvinga, Bridgit Gugulethu
Other Authors: Mooya, Manya M
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Construction Economics and Management 2020
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613244677423104
access_status_str Open Access
author Taruvinga, Bridgit Gugulethu
author2 Mooya, Manya M
author_browse Mooya, Manya M
Taruvinga, Bridgit Gugulethu
author_facet Mooya, Manya M
Taruvinga, Bridgit Gugulethu
author_sort Taruvinga, Bridgit Gugulethu
collection Thesis
description The provision of decent, affordable and well-located housing for low-income communities has been an intractable problem, especially for developing countries. The empirical puzzle that motivated this study is that, despite the adverse macro environment in Zimbabwe, there appears to be private-sector developers who are successfully developing housing benefiting the low-income group. This is so, despite numerous studies that claim that given the magnitude of the housing challenge, a neoliberal doxa in a developing country context as a solution is a fallacy. Working on the broad premise that these developments represent a successful adaptation to the structural environment, the main question guiding the study was - what accounts for the success of market provided low-income housing developments in Zimbabwe despite the environment not being conducive for it? The two sub-questions flowing from this main question were firstly, how does the structural environment enable and/or constrain private sector low-income developments in Zimbabwe? Secondly, what strategies do developers adopt in response to the structural enablers and/or constraints to develop low-income housing in Zimbabwe? From these questions, the study has two hypotheses – the first hypothesis is that despite the adverse environment there exists in Zimbabwe structural enablers that make market solutions to the low-income housing challenge possible. The second hypothesis states that developers have specific discernible strategies that they employ in response to the adverse operating environment to reduce development costs to levels that enable them to provide low-income housing successfully. Using the Structure-Agency model, which is a theoretical framework rooted in institutional economics, a conceptual model to study the development process was developed and used to theorise the impact of structure on agency in the development process. Empirical evidence was gathered using observation, household surveys, and semi-structured interviews. This evidence was obtained from five housing schemes, the local authority, central government, financiers and the developers of the housing schemes, and then processed using NVIVO and SPSS. The study finds that most challenges faced by developers emanate from the institutional environment and access to resources. These challenges are namely central-local government dynamics fuelled by political undertones, lack of access to land suitable for the target group, a bureaucratic and stiff regulatory framework as well as a lack of market provided developer and end-user finance. Enabling factors were mainly the withdrawal of the government in the provision of housing in line with World-Bank neoliberal orthodoxy and incapacitation of the local authority, which eliminated alternative sources of housing for the low income group other than market provided housing, thus widening the market base for the developers. Strategies used by the developers include developer provided finance to the target group, preselling developments, sidestepping the local authority through buying land at the periphery of the local authority boundary, sidestepping regulatory barriers through engaging in corruption, backward integration to promote efficient resource allocation, and an innovative approach to risk management that caters for the low-income group. The study concludes that all these strategies have one overriding objective of cost containment. The findings indicate that there is potential, appetite and scope for more private-sector engagement. On this basis, it is recommended that the key to unlocking this potential lies with the state, as there are several policy implications that flow from these findings if the highlighted constraints are to be addressed. The study makes a number of key contributions to knowledge on market solutions to the low-income housing challenge in the area of theory, methodology, policy and empirical data.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31281
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:04.194Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2020
publishDateRange 2020
publishDateSort 2020
publisher Department of Construction Economics and Management
publisherStr Department of Construction Economics and Management
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31281 Market solutions to the low-income housing challenge – a case study of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe Taruvinga, Bridgit Gugulethu Mooya, Manya M low-income housing market solutions private-sector developers Structure-Agency constraints enablers strategies cost minimisation Bulawayo The provision of decent, affordable and well-located housing for low-income communities has been an intractable problem, especially for developing countries. The empirical puzzle that motivated this study is that, despite the adverse macro environment in Zimbabwe, there appears to be private-sector developers who are successfully developing housing benefiting the low-income group. This is so, despite numerous studies that claim that given the magnitude of the housing challenge, a neoliberal doxa in a developing country context as a solution is a fallacy. Working on the broad premise that these developments represent a successful adaptation to the structural environment, the main question guiding the study was - what accounts for the success of market provided low-income housing developments in Zimbabwe despite the environment not being conducive for it? The two sub-questions flowing from this main question were firstly, how does the structural environment enable and/or constrain private sector low-income developments in Zimbabwe? Secondly, what strategies do developers adopt in response to the structural enablers and/or constraints to develop low-income housing in Zimbabwe? From these questions, the study has two hypotheses – the first hypothesis is that despite the adverse environment there exists in Zimbabwe structural enablers that make market solutions to the low-income housing challenge possible. The second hypothesis states that developers have specific discernible strategies that they employ in response to the adverse operating environment to reduce development costs to levels that enable them to provide low-income housing successfully. Using the Structure-Agency model, which is a theoretical framework rooted in institutional economics, a conceptual model to study the development process was developed and used to theorise the impact of structure on agency in the development process. Empirical evidence was gathered using observation, household surveys, and semi-structured interviews. This evidence was obtained from five housing schemes, the local authority, central government, financiers and the developers of the housing schemes, and then processed using NVIVO and SPSS. The study finds that most challenges faced by developers emanate from the institutional environment and access to resources. These challenges are namely central-local government dynamics fuelled by political undertones, lack of access to land suitable for the target group, a bureaucratic and stiff regulatory framework as well as a lack of market provided developer and end-user finance. Enabling factors were mainly the withdrawal of the government in the provision of housing in line with World-Bank neoliberal orthodoxy and incapacitation of the local authority, which eliminated alternative sources of housing for the low income group other than market provided housing, thus widening the market base for the developers. Strategies used by the developers include developer provided finance to the target group, preselling developments, sidestepping the local authority through buying land at the periphery of the local authority boundary, sidestepping regulatory barriers through engaging in corruption, backward integration to promote efficient resource allocation, and an innovative approach to risk management that caters for the low-income group. The study concludes that all these strategies have one overriding objective of cost containment. The findings indicate that there is potential, appetite and scope for more private-sector engagement. On this basis, it is recommended that the key to unlocking this potential lies with the state, as there are several policy implications that flow from these findings if the highlighted constraints are to be addressed. The study makes a number of key contributions to knowledge on market solutions to the low-income housing challenge in the area of theory, methodology, policy and empirical data. 2020-02-24T13:05:10Z 2020-02-24T13:05:10Z 2019 2020-02-24T10:44:05Z Doctoral Thesis Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31281 eng application/pdf Department of Construction Economics and Management Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment
spellingShingle low-income housing
market solutions
private-sector developers
Structure-Agency
constraints
enablers
strategies
cost minimisation
Bulawayo
Taruvinga, Bridgit Gugulethu
Market solutions to the low-income housing challenge – a case study of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Market solutions to the low-income housing challenge – a case study of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
title_full Market solutions to the low-income housing challenge – a case study of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Market solutions to the low-income housing challenge – a case study of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Market solutions to the low-income housing challenge – a case study of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
title_short Market solutions to the low-income housing challenge – a case study of Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
title_sort market solutions to the low income housing challenge a case study of bulawayo zimbabwe
topic low-income housing
market solutions
private-sector developers
Structure-Agency
constraints
enablers
strategies
cost minimisation
Bulawayo
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31281
work_keys_str_mv AT taruvingabridgitgugulethu marketsolutionstothelowincomehousingchallengeacasestudyofbulawayozimbabwe