Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about South African taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty, with a focus on China
The paper evaluates how South Africa’s public policy towards the death penalty is protected amidst increased taxpayer information transparency. The People’s Republic of China (China) may, under article 22(4) of the Joint Council of Europe/OECD Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Ma...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Commercial Law
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867614157987119104 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Els, Karla |
| author2 | Hattingh, Johann |
| author_browse | Els, Karla Hattingh, Johann |
| author_facet | Hattingh, Johann Els, Karla |
| author_sort | Els, Karla |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The paper evaluates how South Africa’s public policy towards the death penalty is protected amidst increased taxpayer information transparency. The People’s Republic of China (China) may, under article 22(4) of the Joint Council of Europe/OECD Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (2010) (Multilateral Convention), use information received from South Africa, for criminal prosecution of a South African taxpayer in a non-tax matter in China, if the South African Revenue Service (the SARS) authorises such use. The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China 86 of 1997 sanctions the use of the death penalty for various economic crimes and this law has an unlimited territorial scope. China may therefore impose the death penalty on a South African taxpayer at the hands of information supplied by the SARS. This study will establish what public policy-based remedies are available for a South African taxpayer in this scenario. The SARS is not obliged to exchange information with China’s tax authority, as such an action will be contrary to South Africa’s public policy. Where the South African taxpayer concerned is in South Africa, including at a sea- or airport, then the SARS has a constitutional obligation not to exchange the information. Further, the South African state has an international obligation not to exchange the information where the method of execution in China is cruel, inhuman or degrading. The paper concludes that before exchanging the information and authorising its use for non-tax purposes, the SARS must take reasonable steps to evaluate whether it is foreseeable that the exchange of taxpayer information will be against South Africa’s public policy. The SARS is under a legal duty not to exchange information with China where the SARS foresees that such an action may lead to the imposition of the death penalty on a South African taxpayer in China. A further recommendation is that the public policy protection must be reinforced by amending the wording of the Multilateral Convention and the bilateral income tax treaty between China and South Africa in line with what other countries have done, in order to clarify that South Africa’s public policy specifically prevents the imposition of the death penalty. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31577 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:47:35.427Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateRange | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Department of Commercial Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Commercial Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/31577 Public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about South African taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty, with a focus on China Els, Karla Hattingh, Johann Roeleveld, Jennifer commercial law The paper evaluates how South Africa’s public policy towards the death penalty is protected amidst increased taxpayer information transparency. The People’s Republic of China (China) may, under article 22(4) of the Joint Council of Europe/OECD Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (2010) (Multilateral Convention), use information received from South Africa, for criminal prosecution of a South African taxpayer in a non-tax matter in China, if the South African Revenue Service (the SARS) authorises such use. The Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China 86 of 1997 sanctions the use of the death penalty for various economic crimes and this law has an unlimited territorial scope. China may therefore impose the death penalty on a South African taxpayer at the hands of information supplied by the SARS. This study will establish what public policy-based remedies are available for a South African taxpayer in this scenario. The SARS is not obliged to exchange information with China’s tax authority, as such an action will be contrary to South Africa’s public policy. Where the South African taxpayer concerned is in South Africa, including at a sea- or airport, then the SARS has a constitutional obligation not to exchange the information. Further, the South African state has an international obligation not to exchange the information where the method of execution in China is cruel, inhuman or degrading. The paper concludes that before exchanging the information and authorising its use for non-tax purposes, the SARS must take reasonable steps to evaluate whether it is foreseeable that the exchange of taxpayer information will be against South Africa’s public policy. The SARS is under a legal duty not to exchange information with China where the SARS foresees that such an action may lead to the imposition of the death penalty on a South African taxpayer in China. A further recommendation is that the public policy protection must be reinforced by amending the wording of the Multilateral Convention and the bilateral income tax treaty between China and South Africa in line with what other countries have done, in order to clarify that South Africa’s public policy specifically prevents the imposition of the death penalty. 2020-03-12T14:52:20Z 2020-03-12T14:52:20Z 2019 2020-03-12T14:42:53Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31577 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law |
| spellingShingle | commercial law Els, Karla Public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about South African taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty, with a focus on China |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about South African taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty, with a focus on China |
| title_full | Public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about South African taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty, with a focus on China |
| title_fullStr | Public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about South African taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty, with a focus on China |
| title_full_unstemmed | Public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about South African taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty, with a focus on China |
| title_short | Public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about South African taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty, with a focus on China |
| title_sort | public policy considerations arising from the exchange of information about south african taxpayers with countries that sanction the use of death penalty with a focus on china |
| topic | commercial law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31577 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT elskarla publicpolicyconsiderationsarisingfromtheexchangeofinformationaboutsouthafricantaxpayerswithcountriesthatsanctiontheuseofdeathpenaltywithafocusonchina |