Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in the Interpretation of Double Tax Conventions - A South African Perspective
A recent South African judgment concerning the application of the most favoured nation clause in the South Africa/ Netherlands double tax convention has once again raised questions regarding the correct approach to the interpretation of treaties in South Africa and what information should be admissi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Finance and Tax
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867614158205222912 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Claassen, Theunis Cornelis |
| author2 | Roeleveld, Jennifer |
| author_browse | Claassen, Theunis Cornelis Roeleveld, Jennifer |
| author_facet | Roeleveld, Jennifer Claassen, Theunis Cornelis |
| author_sort | Claassen, Theunis Cornelis |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | A recent South African judgment concerning the application of the most favoured nation clause in the South Africa/ Netherlands double tax convention has once again raised questions regarding the correct approach to the interpretation of treaties in South Africa and what information should be admissible as part of this process. In particular the court's strict approach to the admissibility of extrinsic evidence in the interpretation of double tax treaties and the application of the parol evidence rule requires further investigation. This dissertation considers this question by first analysing the approach to interpretation and the admission of extrinsic evidence as provided for under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Thereafter, the South African domestic approach to interpretation and the principles regulating the admission of extrinsic evidence is considered. A particular focus is placed on the parol evidence rule as applied by South African courts. Following this analysis, the dissertation proceeds with a comparison of the two approaches in order to determine any commonalities and differences that might exist. Through this process of comparison, the dissertation finds that the contemporary South African approach to interpretation, is largely aligned with the approach in the Vienna convention, subject to certain limitations on evidence admissibility as provided for under the domestic parol evidence rule. The dissertation concludes that it would be appropriate for a South African court to apply the ordinary domestic principles of interpretation when interpreting tax treaties, provided that this process must still be informed by the principles of the Vienna Convention, other sources of customary international law and foreign case law on the interpretation of treaties. The interpretive process would nevertheless remain subject to the domestic principles of evidence admissibility and the parol evidence rule. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32577 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:47:35.637Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Department of Finance and Tax |
| publisherStr | Department of Finance and Tax |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/32577 The Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in the Interpretation of Double Tax Conventions - A South African Perspective Claassen, Theunis Cornelis Roeleveld, Jennifer International Tax A recent South African judgment concerning the application of the most favoured nation clause in the South Africa/ Netherlands double tax convention has once again raised questions regarding the correct approach to the interpretation of treaties in South Africa and what information should be admissible as part of this process. In particular the court's strict approach to the admissibility of extrinsic evidence in the interpretation of double tax treaties and the application of the parol evidence rule requires further investigation. This dissertation considers this question by first analysing the approach to interpretation and the admission of extrinsic evidence as provided for under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Thereafter, the South African domestic approach to interpretation and the principles regulating the admission of extrinsic evidence is considered. A particular focus is placed on the parol evidence rule as applied by South African courts. Following this analysis, the dissertation proceeds with a comparison of the two approaches in order to determine any commonalities and differences that might exist. Through this process of comparison, the dissertation finds that the contemporary South African approach to interpretation, is largely aligned with the approach in the Vienna convention, subject to certain limitations on evidence admissibility as provided for under the domestic parol evidence rule. The dissertation concludes that it would be appropriate for a South African court to apply the ordinary domestic principles of interpretation when interpreting tax treaties, provided that this process must still be informed by the principles of the Vienna Convention, other sources of customary international law and foreign case law on the interpretation of treaties. The interpretive process would nevertheless remain subject to the domestic principles of evidence admissibility and the parol evidence rule. 2021-01-20T07:46:22Z 2021-01-20T07:46:22Z 2020 2021-01-19T14:42:22Z Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32577 eng application/pdf Department of Finance and Tax Faculty of Commerce |
| spellingShingle | International Tax Claassen, Theunis Cornelis The Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in the Interpretation of Double Tax Conventions - A South African Perspective |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | The Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in the Interpretation of Double Tax Conventions - A South African Perspective |
| title_full | The Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in the Interpretation of Double Tax Conventions - A South African Perspective |
| title_fullStr | The Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in the Interpretation of Double Tax Conventions - A South African Perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in the Interpretation of Double Tax Conventions - A South African Perspective |
| title_short | The Admissibility of Extrinsic Evidence in the Interpretation of Double Tax Conventions - A South African Perspective |
| title_sort | admissibility of extrinsic evidence in the interpretation of double tax conventions a south african perspective |
| topic | International Tax |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/32577 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT claassentheuniscornelis theadmissibilityofextrinsicevidenceintheinterpretationofdoubletaxconventionsasouthafricanperspective AT claassentheuniscornelis admissibilityofextrinsicevidenceintheinterpretationofdoubletaxconventionsasouthafricanperspective |