Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Investigating the views and experiences of Fetal Medicine Practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the Western Cape
Introduction: Fetal medicine practitioners (FMPs) are responsible for making decisions about the appropriateness of a late termination of pregnancy (LTOP) based on their assessment of the severity of the prenatal diagnosis while also taking into account the practical, legal and ethical aspects. This...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Medicine
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613189995233280 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Francois, Sydney |
| author2 | De Vries, Jantina |
| author_browse | De Vries, Jantina Francois, Sydney |
| author_facet | De Vries, Jantina Francois, Sydney |
| author_sort | Francois, Sydney |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Introduction: Fetal medicine practitioners (FMPs) are responsible for making decisions about the appropriateness of a late termination of pregnancy (LTOP) based on their assessment of the severity of the prenatal diagnosis while also taking into account the practical, legal and ethical aspects. This study aimed to investigate the views and experiences of FMPs involved in LTOP decision-making in the Western Cape and how these views may guide decisions to offer LTOP. Specifically, the research questions guiding this study aimed to investigate FMPs views on the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act (CTOPA), No. 92 of 1996, as well as their attitudes towards the provision and ethics of LTOP. Methodology: A total of six semi-structured, individual face-to-face interviews were conducted between February and March 2020 in the privacy of the participant's office. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was used as a framework to analyse the data and transcripts were managed using NVivo 12 software. Results and Discussion: Participants believed that the CTOPA is based on the principle of gradualism and that while women have reproductive choice, TOP becomes progressively restricted as gestation advances to protect the fetus. However, they felt that the specified cut-offs in the CTOPA are arbitrary and open to interpretation and believed there is a need for further documentation to guide practitioners as to which conditions should be considered for LTOP. When making a decision to offer LTOP, participants considered various factors including fetal age, whether a feticide was required and the prognosis. Participants considered that conditions which qualified as severe were untreatable and would have a significant, long-term negative impact on the individual's functioning and quality of life. When considering acceptability of LTOP, participants felt that LTOP was justified to prevent suffering for both the future child and for the parents. However, participants did not believe that LTOP was justified to prevent all disability. Lastly, participants valued societal consensus when making morally demanding decisions and believed that decisions around LTOP needed to be made by multidisciplinary teams to ensure objectivity, as well as to share the moral burden. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/33748 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:32:12.136Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateRange | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Department of Medicine |
| publisherStr | Department of Medicine |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/33748 Investigating the views and experiences of Fetal Medicine Practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the Western Cape Francois, Sydney De Vries, Jantina Palk, Andrea Genetic Counseling Introduction: Fetal medicine practitioners (FMPs) are responsible for making decisions about the appropriateness of a late termination of pregnancy (LTOP) based on their assessment of the severity of the prenatal diagnosis while also taking into account the practical, legal and ethical aspects. This study aimed to investigate the views and experiences of FMPs involved in LTOP decision-making in the Western Cape and how these views may guide decisions to offer LTOP. Specifically, the research questions guiding this study aimed to investigate FMPs views on the Choice on Termination of Pregnancy Act (CTOPA), No. 92 of 1996, as well as their attitudes towards the provision and ethics of LTOP. Methodology: A total of six semi-structured, individual face-to-face interviews were conducted between February and March 2020 in the privacy of the participant's office. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was used as a framework to analyse the data and transcripts were managed using NVivo 12 software. Results and Discussion: Participants believed that the CTOPA is based on the principle of gradualism and that while women have reproductive choice, TOP becomes progressively restricted as gestation advances to protect the fetus. However, they felt that the specified cut-offs in the CTOPA are arbitrary and open to interpretation and believed there is a need for further documentation to guide practitioners as to which conditions should be considered for LTOP. When making a decision to offer LTOP, participants considered various factors including fetal age, whether a feticide was required and the prognosis. Participants considered that conditions which qualified as severe were untreatable and would have a significant, long-term negative impact on the individual's functioning and quality of life. When considering acceptability of LTOP, participants felt that LTOP was justified to prevent suffering for both the future child and for the parents. However, participants did not believe that LTOP was justified to prevent all disability. Lastly, participants valued societal consensus when making morally demanding decisions and believed that decisions around LTOP needed to be made by multidisciplinary teams to ensure objectivity, as well as to share the moral burden. 2021-08-12T10:56:54Z 2021-08-12T10:56:54Z 2021 2021-08-10T08:31:23Z Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33748 eng application/pdf Department of Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences |
| spellingShingle | Genetic Counseling Francois, Sydney Investigating the views and experiences of Fetal Medicine Practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the Western Cape |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Investigating the views and experiences of Fetal Medicine Practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the Western Cape |
| title_full | Investigating the views and experiences of Fetal Medicine Practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the Western Cape |
| title_fullStr | Investigating the views and experiences of Fetal Medicine Practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the Western Cape |
| title_full_unstemmed | Investigating the views and experiences of Fetal Medicine Practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the Western Cape |
| title_short | Investigating the views and experiences of Fetal Medicine Practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the Western Cape |
| title_sort | investigating the views and experiences of fetal medicine practitioners offering late termination of pregnancy in the western cape |
| topic | Genetic Counseling |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/33748 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francoissydney investigatingtheviewsandexperiencesoffetalmedicinepractitionersofferinglateterminationofpregnancyinthewesterncape |