Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

The constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in South Africa

The principal argument of this paper is that South Africa's current drug policy is unsound and unconstitutional. The legislative and policy framework is based on the prohibition of certain psychoactive substances deemed illicit and the criminalisation of their production, distribution and use, to wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vieira, Marco-Alain
Other Authors: de Vos, Pierre
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Law 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613297310695424
access_status_str Open Access
author Vieira, Marco-Alain
author2 de Vos, Pierre
author_browse Vieira, Marco-Alain
de Vos, Pierre
author_facet de Vos, Pierre
Vieira, Marco-Alain
author_sort Vieira, Marco-Alain
collection Thesis
description The principal argument of this paper is that South Africa's current drug policy is unsound and unconstitutional. The legislative and policy framework is based on the prohibition of certain psychoactive substances deemed illicit and the criminalisation of their production, distribution and use, to wit: prohibition drug policy. This paper contends that prohibition drug policy is unsound on the grounds that it is utterly ineffective and vulgarly counterproductive. This is because prohibition drug policy fails to reduce the demand for, restrict the supply of or allay the harms associated with drugs. Furthermore, prohibition drug policy, in fact, greatly exacerbates drug-related harms for individuals and their communities. This is starkly exposed in the light of the devastating consequences pursuant to the drug war. In addition, this paper contends that prohibition drug policy, and the legislation that enacts it, the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act, is unconstitutional. This, on the grounds that it unjustifiably violates the right to privacy, the right to freedom, and the right to human dignity. Moreover, the alternative drug policy of decriminalisation is a far less restrictive means of achieving the legitimate purpose of drug control in society. Lastly, this paper contends that prohibition drug policy ought to be replaced instead by the more effective, just and humane policy of the legal regulation of drugs. This, on the grounds that the South African constitutional dispensation compels a drug policy that takes a human rights-based, public health approach to drug control.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36225
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:54.099Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36225 The constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in South Africa Vieira, Marco-Alain de Vos, Pierre Public Law The principal argument of this paper is that South Africa's current drug policy is unsound and unconstitutional. The legislative and policy framework is based on the prohibition of certain psychoactive substances deemed illicit and the criminalisation of their production, distribution and use, to wit: prohibition drug policy. This paper contends that prohibition drug policy is unsound on the grounds that it is utterly ineffective and vulgarly counterproductive. This is because prohibition drug policy fails to reduce the demand for, restrict the supply of or allay the harms associated with drugs. Furthermore, prohibition drug policy, in fact, greatly exacerbates drug-related harms for individuals and their communities. This is starkly exposed in the light of the devastating consequences pursuant to the drug war. In addition, this paper contends that prohibition drug policy, and the legislation that enacts it, the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act, is unconstitutional. This, on the grounds that it unjustifiably violates the right to privacy, the right to freedom, and the right to human dignity. Moreover, the alternative drug policy of decriminalisation is a far less restrictive means of achieving the legitimate purpose of drug control in society. Lastly, this paper contends that prohibition drug policy ought to be replaced instead by the more effective, just and humane policy of the legal regulation of drugs. This, on the grounds that the South African constitutional dispensation compels a drug policy that takes a human rights-based, public health approach to drug control. 2022-03-29T10:43:15Z 2022-03-29T10:43:15Z 2021 2022-03-29T09:02:31Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36225 eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law
spellingShingle Public Law
Vieira, Marco-Alain
The constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in South Africa
thesis_degree_str Master's
title The constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in South Africa
title_full The constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in South Africa
title_fullStr The constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in South Africa
title_short The constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in South Africa
title_sort constitutional case for legal regulation of illicit drugs in south africa
topic Public Law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36225
work_keys_str_mv AT vieiramarcoalain theconstitutionalcaseforlegalregulationofillicitdrugsinsouthafrica
AT vieiramarcoalain constitutionalcaseforlegalregulationofillicitdrugsinsouthafrica