Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Unlawful sale of state-subsidised houses by the Cape Town community housing company

This dissertation clarifies the protections available to housing subsidy beneficiaries who purchase houses through credit agreements. I look at the legislative framework that protects the right to access to housing in terms of section 26 of the Constitution. I consider a Constitutional Court case Am...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mathiso, Chwayita
Other Authors: Lutchman, Salona
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Public Law 2022
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613351060701184
access_status_str Open Access
author Mathiso, Chwayita
author2 Lutchman, Salona
author_browse Lutchman, Salona
Mathiso, Chwayita
author_facet Lutchman, Salona
Mathiso, Chwayita
author_sort Mathiso, Chwayita
collection Thesis
description This dissertation clarifies the protections available to housing subsidy beneficiaries who purchase houses through credit agreements. I look at the legislative framework that protects the right to access to housing in terms of section 26 of the Constitution. I consider a Constitutional Court case Amardien and Eleven Others v Cape Town Community Housing Company 2019 (2) BCLR 193 (CC) which established that sections 19 of the Alienation of Land Act and 129 of the National Credit Act give the procedural steps that a developer needs to take before it can cancel the sale agreement with subsidy beneficiaries to lawfully cancel such agreements giving effect to the right to housing. The case study determined that where disputes arise, both the National Credit Act and Alienation of Land Act provisions apply in the enforcement of the agreements. The beneficiaries' purchases of their houses must be registered to protect them from the seller selling their properties to third parties. The seller does not remain the property owner and is precluded from repossessing the houses and selling them to third parties without a court order. I argue that such conduct amounts to an unjustified infringement of their housing rights and constitutes an arbitrary deprivation of property. Judicial oversight is required in determining whatever enforcement mechanisms that are appropriate in the circumstances of default by the beneficiaries. I discuss the State's obligations in terms of the Housing Act and international law in the enforcement of the subsidy agreements by the Company relating to the beneficiaries' right to housing. I discuss how the State breached its obligations by failing to fulfil its obligations and the impact of such failure on the beneficiaries.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36485
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:34:45.884Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2022
publishDateRange 2022
publishDateSort 2022
publisher Department of Public Law
publisherStr Department of Public Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/36485 Unlawful sale of state-subsidised houses by the Cape Town community housing company Mathiso, Chwayita Lutchman, Salona public law This dissertation clarifies the protections available to housing subsidy beneficiaries who purchase houses through credit agreements. I look at the legislative framework that protects the right to access to housing in terms of section 26 of the Constitution. I consider a Constitutional Court case Amardien and Eleven Others v Cape Town Community Housing Company 2019 (2) BCLR 193 (CC) which established that sections 19 of the Alienation of Land Act and 129 of the National Credit Act give the procedural steps that a developer needs to take before it can cancel the sale agreement with subsidy beneficiaries to lawfully cancel such agreements giving effect to the right to housing. The case study determined that where disputes arise, both the National Credit Act and Alienation of Land Act provisions apply in the enforcement of the agreements. The beneficiaries' purchases of their houses must be registered to protect them from the seller selling their properties to third parties. The seller does not remain the property owner and is precluded from repossessing the houses and selling them to third parties without a court order. I argue that such conduct amounts to an unjustified infringement of their housing rights and constitutes an arbitrary deprivation of property. Judicial oversight is required in determining whatever enforcement mechanisms that are appropriate in the circumstances of default by the beneficiaries. I discuss the State's obligations in terms of the Housing Act and international law in the enforcement of the subsidy agreements by the Company relating to the beneficiaries' right to housing. I discuss how the State breached its obligations by failing to fulfil its obligations and the impact of such failure on the beneficiaries. 2022-06-21T09:20:06Z 2022-06-21T09:20:06Z 2022 2022-06-21T09:19:27Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36485 eng application/pdf Department of Public Law Faculty of Law
spellingShingle public law
Mathiso, Chwayita
Unlawful sale of state-subsidised houses by the Cape Town community housing company
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Unlawful sale of state-subsidised houses by the Cape Town community housing company
title_full Unlawful sale of state-subsidised houses by the Cape Town community housing company
title_fullStr Unlawful sale of state-subsidised houses by the Cape Town community housing company
title_full_unstemmed Unlawful sale of state-subsidised houses by the Cape Town community housing company
title_short Unlawful sale of state-subsidised houses by the Cape Town community housing company
title_sort unlawful sale of state subsidised houses by the cape town community housing company
topic public law
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/36485
work_keys_str_mv AT mathisochwayita unlawfulsaleofstatesubsidisedhousesbythecapetowncommunityhousingcompany