Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

How WEIRD are the South African acute pain guidelines? An analysis of the 2015 South African acute pain guidelines

Background: There is increasing recognition that health care research is biased owing to skewed reliance on data from WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democracies) populations. This research explores health care discrepancy, primarily experienced by non-westernised, non-industrialised...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Deedat, Raees
Other Authors: Parker, Romy
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613199317073920
access_status_str Open Access
author Deedat, Raees
author2 Parker, Romy
author_browse Deedat, Raees
Parker, Romy
author_facet Parker, Romy
Deedat, Raees
author_sort Deedat, Raees
collection Thesis
description Background: There is increasing recognition that health care research is biased owing to skewed reliance on data from WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democracies) populations. This research explores health care discrepancy, primarily experienced by non-westernised, non-industrialised, non-rich and non-white people in the context of formulating the South African Acute Pain Guidelines, 2015 as published by the South African Society of Anaesthesiologists (the extant protocol at the time of writing). Methods: An established, peer-reviewed and published WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democracies) / non-WEIRD protocol for categorizing clinical population datasets was applied to the published datasets used in formulating the 2015 South African Acute Pain Guidelines. Results: A total of 5,246,847 patient data points were included in the numerous studies that formed part of the final analysis. Only 1% (n=73,539) of the patient data points originated from countries classified as nonWEIRD. Conclusions: The results confirmed the hypothesis that the 2015 South African Acute Pain Guidelines are based primarily on data from WEIRD population datasets. This study reveals an important type of bias in the scientific pain literature and also demonstrates a form of analysis that will encourage future published guidelines and research to be more inclusive of the depth and diversity of South African clinical practice.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37127
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:20.328Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine
publisherStr Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37127 How WEIRD are the South African acute pain guidelines? An analysis of the 2015 South African acute pain guidelines Deedat, Raees Parker, Romy Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Background: There is increasing recognition that health care research is biased owing to skewed reliance on data from WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democracies) populations. This research explores health care discrepancy, primarily experienced by non-westernised, non-industrialised, non-rich and non-white people in the context of formulating the South African Acute Pain Guidelines, 2015 as published by the South African Society of Anaesthesiologists (the extant protocol at the time of writing). Methods: An established, peer-reviewed and published WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democracies) / non-WEIRD protocol for categorizing clinical population datasets was applied to the published datasets used in formulating the 2015 South African Acute Pain Guidelines. Results: A total of 5,246,847 patient data points were included in the numerous studies that formed part of the final analysis. Only 1% (n=73,539) of the patient data points originated from countries classified as nonWEIRD. Conclusions: The results confirmed the hypothesis that the 2015 South African Acute Pain Guidelines are based primarily on data from WEIRD population datasets. This study reveals an important type of bias in the scientific pain literature and also demonstrates a form of analysis that will encourage future published guidelines and research to be more inclusive of the depth and diversity of South African clinical practice. 2023-03-02T09:17:38Z 2023-03-02T09:17:38Z 2022 2023-02-20T12:33:03Z Master Thesis Masters MMed http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37127 eng application/pdf Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences
spellingShingle Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine
Deedat, Raees
How WEIRD are the South African acute pain guidelines? An analysis of the 2015 South African acute pain guidelines
thesis_degree_str Master's
title How WEIRD are the South African acute pain guidelines? An analysis of the 2015 South African acute pain guidelines
title_full How WEIRD are the South African acute pain guidelines? An analysis of the 2015 South African acute pain guidelines
title_fullStr How WEIRD are the South African acute pain guidelines? An analysis of the 2015 South African acute pain guidelines
title_full_unstemmed How WEIRD are the South African acute pain guidelines? An analysis of the 2015 South African acute pain guidelines
title_short How WEIRD are the South African acute pain guidelines? An analysis of the 2015 South African acute pain guidelines
title_sort how weird are the south african acute pain guidelines an analysis of the 2015 south african acute pain guidelines
topic Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37127
work_keys_str_mv AT deedatraees howweirdarethesouthafricanacutepainguidelinesananalysisofthe2015southafricanacutepainguidelines