Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation

Modern carbohydrate simulation models have reached a level of maturity whereby their accuracy is often assumed. However, concerning differences have been reported when comparing the conformational predictions of rhamnose-rich polysaccharides between GLYCAM06 and other widely used carbohydrate force...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lazar, Ryan
Other Authors: Kuttel, Michelle
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Computer Science 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613222094241792
access_status_str Open Access
author Lazar, Ryan
author2 Kuttel, Michelle
author_browse Kuttel, Michelle
Lazar, Ryan
author_facet Kuttel, Michelle
Lazar, Ryan
author_sort Lazar, Ryan
collection Thesis
description Modern carbohydrate simulation models have reached a level of maturity whereby their accuracy is often assumed. However, concerning differences have been reported when comparing the conformational predictions of rhamnose-rich polysaccharides between GLYCAM06 and other widely used carbohydrate force fields. This thesis investigates the scope and origin of these differences. We compare Molecular Dynamics simulations of strategically selected saccharide chains, with both the GLYCAM06 and CHARMM36 carbohydrate force fields. We find significant differences in the conformational predictions of the two force fields. More specifically, collapsed, globular conformations occur in the GLYCAM06 simulations, but are absent in the equivalent CHARMM36 results. The collapsing phenomenon is brought about by a gradual folding process, facilitated by instabilities in the GLYCAM06 a-L-Rha(1®X)-a-L-Rha glycosidic linkage that are stabilised by strong intramolecular interactions. The reduced consideration for repulsive Coulombic forces in GLYCAM06, originating from a collective lack of partial aliphatic hydrogen charges, is likely the principle factor behind these differences. This work suggests critical areas for refinement in GLYCAM06 that will be required for the force field to accurately model rhamnose-rich polysaccharides. The insights gained in this work have the potential to assist in the development of more accurate force fields for modelling carbohydrates.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37461
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:42.829Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2023
publishDateRange 2023
publishDateSort 2023
publisher Department of Computer Science
publisherStr Department of Computer Science
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/37461 Comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation Lazar, Ryan Kuttel, Michelle Ravenscroft, Neil Akher, Farideh Computer Science Modern carbohydrate simulation models have reached a level of maturity whereby their accuracy is often assumed. However, concerning differences have been reported when comparing the conformational predictions of rhamnose-rich polysaccharides between GLYCAM06 and other widely used carbohydrate force fields. This thesis investigates the scope and origin of these differences. We compare Molecular Dynamics simulations of strategically selected saccharide chains, with both the GLYCAM06 and CHARMM36 carbohydrate force fields. We find significant differences in the conformational predictions of the two force fields. More specifically, collapsed, globular conformations occur in the GLYCAM06 simulations, but are absent in the equivalent CHARMM36 results. The collapsing phenomenon is brought about by a gradual folding process, facilitated by instabilities in the GLYCAM06 a-L-Rha(1®X)-a-L-Rha glycosidic linkage that are stabilised by strong intramolecular interactions. The reduced consideration for repulsive Coulombic forces in GLYCAM06, originating from a collective lack of partial aliphatic hydrogen charges, is likely the principle factor behind these differences. This work suggests critical areas for refinement in GLYCAM06 that will be required for the force field to accurately model rhamnose-rich polysaccharides. The insights gained in this work have the potential to assist in the development of more accurate force fields for modelling carbohydrates. 2023-03-16T09:52:43Z 2023-03-16T09:52:43Z 2022 2023-03-16T09:49:12Z Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37461 eng application/pdf Department of Computer Science Faculty of Science
spellingShingle Computer Science
Lazar, Ryan
Comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation
title_full Comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation
title_short Comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation
title_sort comparative evaluation of two carbohydrate force fields for modelling polysaccharide conformation
topic Computer Science
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/37461
work_keys_str_mv AT lazarryan comparativeevaluationoftwocarbohydrateforcefieldsformodellingpolysaccharideconformation