Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
There is increasing understanding of the role that both ecological and built infrastructure can have in economic growth and development in terms of water supply. However, degradation of ecological infrastructure (EI) is resulting in the loss of valuable ecosystem services that benefit human well-bei...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Biological Sciences
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867611315625787392 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Webster, Kayla |
| author2 | Turpie, Jane |
| author_browse | Turpie, Jane Webster, Kayla |
| author_facet | Turpie, Jane Webster, Kayla |
| author_sort | Webster, Kayla |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | There is increasing understanding of the role that both ecological and built infrastructure can have in economic growth and development in terms of water supply. However, degradation of ecological infrastructure (EI) is resulting in the loss of valuable ecosystem services that benefit human well-being. Invasive alien plants (IAPs) are degrading catchment areas which negatively impacts delivery of hydrological ecosystem services. Clearing IAPs is considered a catchment conservation intervention that preserves these services. This study used South Africa as a case study to analyse the viability of investing in EI by way of IAP clearing compared to built infrastructure augmentation interventions to secure water supply in the long term. Unit reference values (URVs) were used to compare costeffectiveness between ecological and built interventions for 11 of South Africa's regional water supply systems (WSSs). Built infrastructure URVs were available from government reports, while URVs for EI were calculated by modelling spread of IAPs, calculating the cost to clear them between 2022 and 2050 and the potential amount of water saved in their absence. The results provide quantitative evidence of the cost-effectiveness of investing in EI against built infrastructure options to secure water supply. The potential water to be gained by clearing IAPs from catchment areas of existing bulk water infrastructure was approximately 40% of what would be gained by implementing all built infrastructure interventions by 2050. It is recommended that IAP clearing be pushed ahead of built infrastructure interventions to delay costs associated with further built infrastructure development. Governing institutions, economists and natural resource managers are therefore encouraged to coordinate efforts towards designing EI investment frameworks as a sustainable, resilient approach to securing water supply. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/38202 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateRange | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Department of Biological Sciences |
| publisherStr | Department of Biological Sciences |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/38202 Viability analysis for investing in ecological infrastructure to secure water supply: A case study of South Africa Webster, Kayla Turpie, Jane Shackleton, Sheona Letley, Gwyneth Conservation Biology There is increasing understanding of the role that both ecological and built infrastructure can have in economic growth and development in terms of water supply. However, degradation of ecological infrastructure (EI) is resulting in the loss of valuable ecosystem services that benefit human well-being. Invasive alien plants (IAPs) are degrading catchment areas which negatively impacts delivery of hydrological ecosystem services. Clearing IAPs is considered a catchment conservation intervention that preserves these services. This study used South Africa as a case study to analyse the viability of investing in EI by way of IAP clearing compared to built infrastructure augmentation interventions to secure water supply in the long term. Unit reference values (URVs) were used to compare costeffectiveness between ecological and built interventions for 11 of South Africa's regional water supply systems (WSSs). Built infrastructure URVs were available from government reports, while URVs for EI were calculated by modelling spread of IAPs, calculating the cost to clear them between 2022 and 2050 and the potential amount of water saved in their absence. The results provide quantitative evidence of the cost-effectiveness of investing in EI against built infrastructure options to secure water supply. The potential water to be gained by clearing IAPs from catchment areas of existing bulk water infrastructure was approximately 40% of what would be gained by implementing all built infrastructure interventions by 2050. It is recommended that IAP clearing be pushed ahead of built infrastructure interventions to delay costs associated with further built infrastructure development. Governing institutions, economists and natural resource managers are therefore encouraged to coordinate efforts towards designing EI investment frameworks as a sustainable, resilient approach to securing water supply. 2023-07-30T09:54:59Z 2023-07-30T09:54:59Z 2023 2023-07-30T09:54:28Z Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38202 eng application/pdf Department of Biological Sciences Faculty of Science |
| spellingShingle | Conservation Biology Webster, Kayla Viability analysis for investing in ecological infrastructure to secure water supply: A case study of South Africa |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Viability analysis for investing in ecological infrastructure to secure water supply: A case study of South Africa |
| title_full | Viability analysis for investing in ecological infrastructure to secure water supply: A case study of South Africa |
| title_fullStr | Viability analysis for investing in ecological infrastructure to secure water supply: A case study of South Africa |
| title_full_unstemmed | Viability analysis for investing in ecological infrastructure to secure water supply: A case study of South Africa |
| title_short | Viability analysis for investing in ecological infrastructure to secure water supply: A case study of South Africa |
| title_sort | viability analysis for investing in ecological infrastructure to secure water supply a case study of south africa |
| topic | Conservation Biology |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38202 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT websterkayla viabilityanalysisforinvestinginecologicalinfrastructuretosecurewatersupplyacasestudyofsouthafrica |