Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
This paper deals with the treatment of spare parts on ships, in accordance with the Income Tax Act, No. 58 of 1962 (as amended), (hereafter 'the Act'). The question that is central to this issue is specifically when a spare part is brought into use. Flowing from this is the question of the purpose o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Commercial Law
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613206270181376 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Kotze, Johan L |
| author_browse | Kotze, Johan L |
| author_facet | Kotze, Johan L |
| author_sort | Kotze, Johan L |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | This paper deals with the treatment of spare parts on ships, in accordance with the Income Tax Act, No. 58 of 1962 (as amended), (hereafter 'the Act'). The question that is central to this issue is specifically when a spare part is brought into use. Flowing from this is the question of the purpose of a spare part. In summary the issues are as follow: What expenditure should properly be regarded as forming part of the cost of a ship? The expenditure envisaged here comprises essential safety equipment and spares included in a ship at the time of its construction prior to commissioning and its maiden voyage. If such expenditure is considered not to form part of the cost of a ship, should it in the alternative be deducted as operating expenditure? Should it then be included in trading stock as 'consumable stores and spare parts ... used or consumed' by virtue of having been brought into use or consumed when added to the ship? Should the cost of the subsequent replacement of the above items properly be regarded as operating expenditure? Apparently an airline received a written ruling from the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services that if an aircraft is acquired with a spare engine, it will be regarded as part and parcel of the plane. It will be regarded as one asset for taxation purposes on which wear and tear is permitted. The airline is not required to include this 'spare' engine as a spare part for trading stock purposes. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/38473 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:32:27.580Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publishDateRange | 2023 |
| publishDateSort | 2023 |
| publisher | Department of Commercial Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Commercial Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/38473 Insurance spares, safety equipment and spare parts on ships Kotze, Johan L law This paper deals with the treatment of spare parts on ships, in accordance with the Income Tax Act, No. 58 of 1962 (as amended), (hereafter 'the Act'). The question that is central to this issue is specifically when a spare part is brought into use. Flowing from this is the question of the purpose of a spare part. In summary the issues are as follow: What expenditure should properly be regarded as forming part of the cost of a ship? The expenditure envisaged here comprises essential safety equipment and spares included in a ship at the time of its construction prior to commissioning and its maiden voyage. If such expenditure is considered not to form part of the cost of a ship, should it in the alternative be deducted as operating expenditure? Should it then be included in trading stock as 'consumable stores and spare parts ... used or consumed' by virtue of having been brought into use or consumed when added to the ship? Should the cost of the subsequent replacement of the above items properly be regarded as operating expenditure? Apparently an airline received a written ruling from the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Services that if an aircraft is acquired with a spare engine, it will be regarded as part and parcel of the plane. It will be regarded as one asset for taxation purposes on which wear and tear is permitted. The airline is not required to include this 'spare' engine as a spare part for trading stock purposes. 2023-09-08T12:25:18Z 2023-09-08T12:25:18Z 1999 2023-09-08T12:24:53Z Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38473 eng application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law |
| spellingShingle | law Kotze, Johan L Insurance spares, safety equipment and spare parts on ships |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Insurance spares, safety equipment and spare parts on ships |
| title_full | Insurance spares, safety equipment and spare parts on ships |
| title_fullStr | Insurance spares, safety equipment and spare parts on ships |
| title_full_unstemmed | Insurance spares, safety equipment and spare parts on ships |
| title_short | Insurance spares, safety equipment and spare parts on ships |
| title_sort | insurance spares safety equipment and spare parts on ships |
| topic | law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/38473 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kotzejohanl insurancesparessafetyequipmentandsparepartsonships |