Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Pure economic loss from a comparative perspective
English law originally did not provide an action in cases where pure economic loss was caused negligently. From the Middle Ages (i.e. from more or less the 13th century), when there arose a remedy called 'trespass', which was applicable only in cases of direct forcible injury,
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Centre for Law and Society
2023
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: Pure economic loss from a comparative perspective
- The reflective loss principle in South African company law
- Prevalence and patterns of hearing loss among the elderly with cigarette smoking and alcohol experience
- Prevalence, pattern and predictors of hearing loss among rural school-age children in Ogun State, Nigeria
- Negligently inflicted pure economic loss in the case of defective buildings: a comparison of South African, English and German Law
- Learning to Coordinate Efficiently through Multiagent Soft Q-Learning in the presence of Game-Theoretic Pathologies
- Negligently caused pure economic loss from a comparative perspective