Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
In the study of religion, a variety of definitions of religion have been presented. These numerous definitions or theories are often divergent in focus, aim and interpretation. This can be problematic, as these definitions or theories often speak to a specific end-goal and quite clearly ignore, or f...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Religious Studies
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In the study of religion, a variety of definitions of religion have been presented. These numerous definitions or theories are often divergent in focus, aim and interpretation. This can be problematic, as these definitions or theories often speak to a specific end-goal and quite clearly ignore, or fail to address, the multi-faceted issues that arise with the engagement of this endeavor. In the study of a religious event, in particular, these individual theories prove inadequate in illuminating the many varying factors that often contribute to the event's emergence. This work will address this problem and further propose that in fact many theories, or "intertheoriality" is necessary in order to more fully and comprehensively understand the manifestation of such an event. Different theories of religion and socio-religious movement theory, both classic and contemporary, will be employed in order to demonstrate that no one single definition or theory of religion is adequate in elucidating the numerous factors at play in relation to a specific religious event. Theories from Emile Durkheim, Max Weber, Karl Marx, Mircea Eliade, and David Chidester, as well as a selection of socio-religious movement theories, will be used to explain the Great Xhosa Cattle-Killing Movement of 1856-1857. |
|---|