Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Just joking: jest as a defence to defamation
The South African law of defamation seeks to balance the plaintiff's right to reputation against the defendant's right to freedom of expression. Humour complicates this balance because its appreciation is hyper context-dependent and subjective, rendering the line between serious defamatory statement...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Private Law
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613306955497472 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Thompson, Simon |
| author2 | Boonzaier, Leo |
| author_browse | Boonzaier, Leo Thompson, Simon |
| author_facet | Boonzaier, Leo Thompson, Simon |
| author_sort | Thompson, Simon |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | The South African law of defamation seeks to balance the plaintiff's right to reputation against the defendant's right to freedom of expression. Humour complicates this balance because its appreciation is hyper context-dependent and subjective, rendering the line between serious defamatory statements of fact and non-serious jokes difficult to draw. This dissertation discusses the ways in which the South African law of defamation regulates humorous statements, paying particular attention to the element of defamatoriness and the defences to an action for defamation. It argues that superiority humour, which is funny because it belittles the plaintiff, is being unduly curtailed by the courts' erroneous application of a flawed test for defamatoriness based on the plaintiff's mere exposure to ridicule. The undesirable result is that the defendant will be held liable for superiority humour even in those instances where the plaintiff has not been defamed. It also argues that humour should receive greater protection under the defences available to the defendant in an action for defamation, particularly the defence of qualified privilege. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/39927 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:34:03.682Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publishDateRange | 2024 |
| publishDateSort | 2024 |
| publisher | Department of Private Law |
| publisherStr | Department of Private Law |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/39927 Just joking: jest as a defence to defamation Thompson, Simon Boonzaier, Leo Private Law The South African law of defamation seeks to balance the plaintiff's right to reputation against the defendant's right to freedom of expression. Humour complicates this balance because its appreciation is hyper context-dependent and subjective, rendering the line between serious defamatory statements of fact and non-serious jokes difficult to draw. This dissertation discusses the ways in which the South African law of defamation regulates humorous statements, paying particular attention to the element of defamatoriness and the defences to an action for defamation. It argues that superiority humour, which is funny because it belittles the plaintiff, is being unduly curtailed by the courts' erroneous application of a flawed test for defamatoriness based on the plaintiff's mere exposure to ridicule. The undesirable result is that the defendant will be held liable for superiority humour even in those instances where the plaintiff has not been defamed. It also argues that humour should receive greater protection under the defences available to the defendant in an action for defamation, particularly the defence of qualified privilege. 2024-06-19T07:44:32Z 2024-06-19T07:44:32Z 2023 2024-06-06T09:55:35Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/39927 eng application/pdf Department of Private Law Faculty of Law |
| spellingShingle | Private Law Thompson, Simon Just joking: jest as a defence to defamation |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Just joking: jest as a defence to defamation |
| title_full | Just joking: jest as a defence to defamation |
| title_fullStr | Just joking: jest as a defence to defamation |
| title_full_unstemmed | Just joking: jest as a defence to defamation |
| title_short | Just joking: jest as a defence to defamation |
| title_sort | just joking jest as a defence to defamation |
| topic | Private Law |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/39927 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonsimon justjokingjestasadefencetodefamation |