Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Resettlement & Namibian San communities: prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment

Namibia's Resettlement Programme aims to uplift all Namibians through the redistribution of land. This land reform programme seeks to assist the destitute and landless to become self-sufficient within five years. Policy provisions commit to providing special attention to San people as the most margi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McLean, Bernice
Other Authors: Holloway, Ailsa
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Department of Environmental and Geographical Science 2024
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613196064391168
access_status_str Open Access
author McLean, Bernice
author2 Holloway, Ailsa
author_browse Holloway, Ailsa
McLean, Bernice
author_facet Holloway, Ailsa
McLean, Bernice
author_sort McLean, Bernice
collection Thesis
description Namibia's Resettlement Programme aims to uplift all Namibians through the redistribution of land. This land reform programme seeks to assist the destitute and landless to become self-sufficient within five years. Policy provisions commit to providing special attention to San people as the most marginalised Namibian community. A critical evaluation of the resettlement process, however, reveals that this is simply rhetoric. Project planning and design is centralised and is undertaken on an ad hoc basis. Resettlement is enabled by rigid, prescriptive and exclusive legislation which has informed the technocratic manner in which the resettlement process is implemented. The authoritative approach adopted to resettlement is goal oriented. It focuses on the short-term product of poverty alleviation, rather than the process of self-sufficiency through empowerment for settlers. This provision of assistance fulfils only the immediate basic needs of settlers as are determined by authorities. The ability of San settlers to achieve autonomy through resettlement is restricted by the incapacity of the process to adapt to diverse social dynamics and locally conceived priorities. Community-level implementation of resettlement remains in the hands of authorities entrenching the continued dependency of San settlers on government provisions. Forced integration of settlers of different social groups whilst disregarding diverse local priorities, fuels social tensions and reduces community cohesion on the projects. The subordination and impoverishment of San settlers is magnified through resettlement. Negative preconceptions compound communication problems on the resettlement projects. Assistance empowering San settlers to improve their well-being, relate to a more community-based approach, identifying and acting on local needs and aspirations. San settlers continue to diversify their livelihood strategies to overcome the challenges posed by their circumstances. The inability of the resettlement process to accommodate these strategies results in a socially, economically and environmentally unsustainable land reform process.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40690
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language eng
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:32:17.361Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2024
publishDateRange 2024
publishDateSort 2024
publisher Department of Environmental and Geographical Science
publisherStr Department of Environmental and Geographical Science
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/40690 Resettlement & Namibian San communities: prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment McLean, Bernice Holloway, Ailsa Environmental and Geographical Science Namibia's Resettlement Programme aims to uplift all Namibians through the redistribution of land. This land reform programme seeks to assist the destitute and landless to become self-sufficient within five years. Policy provisions commit to providing special attention to San people as the most marginalised Namibian community. A critical evaluation of the resettlement process, however, reveals that this is simply rhetoric. Project planning and design is centralised and is undertaken on an ad hoc basis. Resettlement is enabled by rigid, prescriptive and exclusive legislation which has informed the technocratic manner in which the resettlement process is implemented. The authoritative approach adopted to resettlement is goal oriented. It focuses on the short-term product of poverty alleviation, rather than the process of self-sufficiency through empowerment for settlers. This provision of assistance fulfils only the immediate basic needs of settlers as are determined by authorities. The ability of San settlers to achieve autonomy through resettlement is restricted by the incapacity of the process to adapt to diverse social dynamics and locally conceived priorities. Community-level implementation of resettlement remains in the hands of authorities entrenching the continued dependency of San settlers on government provisions. Forced integration of settlers of different social groups whilst disregarding diverse local priorities, fuels social tensions and reduces community cohesion on the projects. The subordination and impoverishment of San settlers is magnified through resettlement. Negative preconceptions compound communication problems on the resettlement projects. Assistance empowering San settlers to improve their well-being, relate to a more community-based approach, identifying and acting on local needs and aspirations. San settlers continue to diversify their livelihood strategies to overcome the challenges posed by their circumstances. The inability of the resettlement process to accommodate these strategies results in a socially, economically and environmentally unsustainable land reform process. 2024-11-07T10:02:33Z 2024-11-07T10:02:33Z 1998 2024-07-11T08:29:33Z Thesis / Dissertation Doctoral PhD http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40690 eng application/pdf Department of Environmental and Geographical Science Faculty of Science
spellingShingle Environmental and Geographical Science
McLean, Bernice
Resettlement & Namibian San communities: prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment
thesis_degree_str Doctoral
title Resettlement & Namibian San communities: prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment
title_full Resettlement & Namibian San communities: prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment
title_fullStr Resettlement & Namibian San communities: prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment
title_full_unstemmed Resettlement & Namibian San communities: prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment
title_short Resettlement & Namibian San communities: prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment
title_sort resettlement namibian san communities prospectives for sustainable community development through empowerment
topic Environmental and Geographical Science
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/40690
work_keys_str_mv AT mcleanbernice resettlementnamibiansancommunitiesprospectivesforsustainablecommunitydevelopmentthroughempowerment