Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Plain language and multilingualism in South Africa: a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting
Multilingualism and plain language are underexamined concepts in the prescripts of South African law, in which their minimal representation has deterred the ordinary citizen from linguistic liberty, due to complex and insufferable legalese. Madiba (2014) and Moen et al. (2023) studied literacy and m...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English Eng |
| Published: |
African Studies
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613189915541504 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Maziba, Gugu |
| author2 | Mpendukana, Sibonile |
| author_browse | Maziba, Gugu Mpendukana, Sibonile |
| author_facet | Mpendukana, Sibonile Maziba, Gugu |
| author_sort | Maziba, Gugu |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Multilingualism and plain language are underexamined concepts in the prescripts of South African law, in which their minimal representation has deterred the ordinary citizen from linguistic liberty, due to complex and insufferable legalese. Madiba (2014) and Moen et al. (2023) studied literacy and multilingual classrooms in South Africa where indigenous knowledge creation and sustenance were discovered as literacy interventions. This study focuses on multilingualism and plain language within the prescripts of South African law drafting in assembling plausible resolutions for legal illiteracy among ordinary consumers. Previous studies looked at multilingualism and plain language as a lacking factor in the judiciary and recommended that rigorous indigenous language implementation be adopted by the law for fair consumer protection. The study focuses on the challenges faced when decoding legalese and enquires as to whether plain language would be more helpful for a select sample of South Africans. This study looks at how the judiciary can use plain language as a principal framework for legal indigenous language glossaries and vocabularies. The study conducted interviews and observations using law order documentary evidence. The participants were provided with a law order to read, which was followed by a semi-structured interview and discussion. The study discovered that the select sample in the study tentatively points to a preference to read law documents in English. Indigenous languages were referred to as optional languages or ‘niceto-haves' for law orders to be provided in. The English desire emanated from the economic and social status of the language, which provided more improved educational and employment outcomes than indigenous languages. English dominates legal communication even though citizens struggle with its legal understanding. Legalese tends to be upheld by law professionals in which commitment to law literacy interventions for unlearned citizens needs to be consigned to. Moreover, the study found that media viewership influenced citizen emotions and perceptions of the law as legal televised programming often provides law education and insight. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42449 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | English Eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:32:12.136Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publishDateRange | 2025 |
| publishDateSort | 2025 |
| publisher | African Studies |
| publisherStr | African Studies |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/42449 Plain language and multilingualism in South Africa: a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting Maziba, Gugu Mpendukana, Sibonile multilingualism Multilingualism and plain language are underexamined concepts in the prescripts of South African law, in which their minimal representation has deterred the ordinary citizen from linguistic liberty, due to complex and insufferable legalese. Madiba (2014) and Moen et al. (2023) studied literacy and multilingual classrooms in South Africa where indigenous knowledge creation and sustenance were discovered as literacy interventions. This study focuses on multilingualism and plain language within the prescripts of South African law drafting in assembling plausible resolutions for legal illiteracy among ordinary consumers. Previous studies looked at multilingualism and plain language as a lacking factor in the judiciary and recommended that rigorous indigenous language implementation be adopted by the law for fair consumer protection. The study focuses on the challenges faced when decoding legalese and enquires as to whether plain language would be more helpful for a select sample of South Africans. This study looks at how the judiciary can use plain language as a principal framework for legal indigenous language glossaries and vocabularies. The study conducted interviews and observations using law order documentary evidence. The participants were provided with a law order to read, which was followed by a semi-structured interview and discussion. The study discovered that the select sample in the study tentatively points to a preference to read law documents in English. Indigenous languages were referred to as optional languages or ‘niceto-haves' for law orders to be provided in. The English desire emanated from the economic and social status of the language, which provided more improved educational and employment outcomes than indigenous languages. English dominates legal communication even though citizens struggle with its legal understanding. Legalese tends to be upheld by law professionals in which commitment to law literacy interventions for unlearned citizens needs to be consigned to. Moreover, the study found that media viewership influenced citizen emotions and perceptions of the law as legal televised programming often provides law education and insight. 2025-12-18T07:11:27Z 2025-12-18T07:11:27Z 2025 2025-12-18T07:09:27Z Thesis / Dissertation Masters MA http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42449 en Eng application/pdf African Studies Faculty of Humanities University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | multilingualism Maziba, Gugu Plain language and multilingualism in South Africa: a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | Plain language and multilingualism in South Africa: a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting |
| title_full | Plain language and multilingualism in South Africa: a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting |
| title_fullStr | Plain language and multilingualism in South Africa: a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting |
| title_full_unstemmed | Plain language and multilingualism in South Africa: a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting |
| title_short | Plain language and multilingualism in South Africa: a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting |
| title_sort | plain language and multilingualism in south africa a focus on literacy and understanding in law drafting |
| topic | multilingualism |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/42449 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mazibagugu plainlanguageandmultilingualisminsouthafricaafocusonliteracyandunderstandinginlawdrafting |