Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
The Brummeria judgment: a comprehensive discourse on this case and its application to interest free loans granted to trusts
In September 2007, the world of South African tax planning received an unexpected judgment in the income tax case of the Commissioner for South African Revenue Service v Brummeria Renaissance (Phj) Ltd and others2. The reason why the decision in this case caused much controversy was because it ran c...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Centre for Law and Society
2026
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In September 2007, the world of South African tax planning received an unexpected judgment in the income tax case of the Commissioner for South African Revenue Service v Brummeria Renaissance (Phj) Ltd and others2. The reason why the decision in this case caused much controversy was because it ran counter to the long-held belief that interest-free loans are not taxable in the hands of the borrower. Rather, it may now be possible for the Commissioner for South African Revenue Services to impute a notional income on the borrower. This paper seeks to examine whether or not this is appropriate and in which circumstances this is applicable. The raison deter why the judgment was unexpected was due to the fact that taxing notional income is contrary to what was held by Feetham JA in the Butcher Brothers case3 where in the context of lease premiums, the consideration had to have an "ascertainable money value, and not merely a conjectural value" |
|---|