Full Text Available

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in Zurich (Switzerland)

Parties to international commercial transactions choose to refer potential disputes to arbitration instead of litigation for different reasons. In most of the cases an important factor for a decision in favour of arbitration is that they want to have a potential dispute settled quickly. Even if the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marti, Ulrich
Format: Thesis
Language:en_US
Published: Department of Commercial Law 2014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1867613283002875905
access_status_str Open Access
author Marti, Ulrich
author_browse Marti, Ulrich
author_facet Marti, Ulrich
author_sort Marti, Ulrich
collection Thesis
description Parties to international commercial transactions choose to refer potential disputes to arbitration instead of litigation for different reasons. In most of the cases an important factor for a decision in favour of arbitration is that they want to have a potential dispute settled quickly. Even if the dispute resolution through arbitration is often speedier than court proceedings, it still takes a fair amount of time until a final award is rendered. Thus, it might become necessary to obtain interim measures to regulate the terms of an ongoing relationship for the duration of the arbitral proceedings, to stabilize matters on a provisional basis or to avoid frustration of the final award. If the need for interim measure arises, the concerned party will be confronted with a bundle of complex legal and tactical questions. The second chapter deals with the question which judicial authority has jurisdiction to order interim measures in international arbitral proceedings conducted in Switzerland, respectively with the legislative and contractual framework that must be considered in order to determine the competent authority. As will be explained, arbitral tribunals and state courts may have concurrent jurisdiction to order interim measures and thus, the parties will have to decide which authority to apply to. To determine which possibility will be more advantageous in the concrete circumstances they have to compare the two options. Thus, the third chapter is concerned with interim measures available to arbitral tribunals, whereas the fourth chapter deals with those available to state courts. In these two chapters the focus is particularly on the variety of interim measures, some procedural aspects and on questions with regard to enforcement. In chapter five some selected questions and problems caused by the concurrent jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal and the state court will be addressed. I will conclude with the question whether or not one can determine a general rule that it is more advantageous for parties to international arbitration to address either the state court or the arbitral tribunal with a request for interim measure.
format Thesis
id oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/4664
institution University of Cape Town (South Africa)
language en_US
last_indexed 2026-06-10T12:33:40.116Z
license_str Not specified — see source repository
provenance_str_mv Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
publishDate 2014
publishDateRange 2014
publishDateSort 2014
publisher Department of Commercial Law
publisherStr Department of Commercial Law
record_format dspace
source_str UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository
spelling oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/4664 Interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in Zurich (Switzerland) Marti, Ulrich Parties to international commercial transactions choose to refer potential disputes to arbitration instead of litigation for different reasons. In most of the cases an important factor for a decision in favour of arbitration is that they want to have a potential dispute settled quickly. Even if the dispute resolution through arbitration is often speedier than court proceedings, it still takes a fair amount of time until a final award is rendered. Thus, it might become necessary to obtain interim measures to regulate the terms of an ongoing relationship for the duration of the arbitral proceedings, to stabilize matters on a provisional basis or to avoid frustration of the final award. If the need for interim measure arises, the concerned party will be confronted with a bundle of complex legal and tactical questions. The second chapter deals with the question which judicial authority has jurisdiction to order interim measures in international arbitral proceedings conducted in Switzerland, respectively with the legislative and contractual framework that must be considered in order to determine the competent authority. As will be explained, arbitral tribunals and state courts may have concurrent jurisdiction to order interim measures and thus, the parties will have to decide which authority to apply to. To determine which possibility will be more advantageous in the concrete circumstances they have to compare the two options. Thus, the third chapter is concerned with interim measures available to arbitral tribunals, whereas the fourth chapter deals with those available to state courts. In these two chapters the focus is particularly on the variety of interim measures, some procedural aspects and on questions with regard to enforcement. In chapter five some selected questions and problems caused by the concurrent jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal and the state court will be addressed. I will conclude with the question whether or not one can determine a general rule that it is more advantageous for parties to international arbitration to address either the state court or the arbitral tribunal with a request for interim measure. 2014-07-30T18:16:00Z 2014-07-30T18:16:00Z 2014-07-30 Master Thesis Masters LLM http://hdl.handle.net/11427/4664 en_US application/pdf Department of Commercial Law Faculty of Law University of Cape Town
spellingShingle Marti, Ulrich
Interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in Zurich (Switzerland)
thesis_degree_str Master's
title Interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in Zurich (Switzerland)
title_full Interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in Zurich (Switzerland)
title_fullStr Interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in Zurich (Switzerland)
title_full_unstemmed Interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in Zurich (Switzerland)
title_short Interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in Zurich (Switzerland)
title_sort interim measures in international commercial arbitration with seat in zurich switzerland
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/4664
work_keys_str_mv AT martiulrich interimmeasuresininternationalcommercialarbitrationwithseatinzurichswitzerland