Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
Includes bibliographical references.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Department of Finance and Tax
2014
|
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1867613212315222017 |
|---|---|
| access_status_str | Open Access |
| author | Driman, Robert Frank |
| author2 | Surtees, Peter |
| author_browse | Driman, Robert Frank Surtees, Peter |
| author_facet | Surtees, Peter Driman, Robert Frank |
| author_sort | Driman, Robert Frank |
| collection | Thesis |
| description | Includes bibliographical references. |
| format | Thesis |
| id | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/8559 |
| institution | University of Cape Town (South Africa) |
| language | eng |
| last_indexed | 2026-06-10T12:32:33.381Z |
| license_str | Not specified — see source repository |
| provenance_str_mv | Harvested via OAI-PMH from UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateRange | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Department of Finance and Tax |
| publisherStr | Department of Finance and Tax |
| record_format | dspace |
| source_str | UCTD — University of Cape Town Open Access Repository |
| spelling | oai:open.uct.ac.za:11427/8559 The usefulness (or otherwise) of the concept of Driman, Robert Frank Surtees, Peter Includes bibliographical references. The paper discusses and traces the history of tax policy which creates the basis for the difference between illegal tax evasion, and tax avoidance (which may also be illegal). The discussion reveals the cause of ambiguities in judicial interpretation (and through this the effect of avoidance legislation) of schemes which cause tax to be avoided - which is found in policy considerations. The South African anti-avoidance common law and legislation is described. A spotlight is placed on the most subjective policy factor which is used to test for impermissible avoidance - the concept of abnormality. The NWK2 decision is examined in some detail as a useful illustrator of how the policy by which the court approaches anti-avoidance matters affects the outcome of the case - and just how subjective are policy-based tests for what is permissible or not. There is an examination of the obverse of using subjective concepts by removing them from the law. The paper finds that subjective factors while having some use - lead to uncertainty in tax planning, and states why this is undesirable. The paper does not examine in detail whether courts have a pre-judgmental approach to tax matters, but recommends that as far as possible tests in anti-avoidance measures should avoid subjective elements. A recommendation is proposed of how this may be achieved in relation to the concept of abnormality. 2014-10-17T10:12:48Z 2014-10-17T10:12:48Z 2014 Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8559 eng application/pdf Department of Finance and Tax Faculty of Commerce University of Cape Town |
| spellingShingle | Driman, Robert Frank The usefulness (or otherwise) of the concept of |
| thesis_degree_str | Master's |
| title | The usefulness (or otherwise) of the concept of |
| title_full | The usefulness (or otherwise) of the concept of |
| title_fullStr | The usefulness (or otherwise) of the concept of |
| title_full_unstemmed | The usefulness (or otherwise) of the concept of |
| title_short | The usefulness (or otherwise) of the concept of |
| title_sort | usefulness or otherwise of the concept of |
| url | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/8559 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT drimanrobertfrank theusefulnessorotherwiseoftheconceptof AT drimanrobertfrank usefulnessorotherwiseoftheconceptof |