Full Text Available
Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.
A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?
Saved in:
| Published in: | Administrative Law Review |
|---|---|
| Format: | Online Article RSS Article |
| Published: |
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items: A Cost-Benefit Interpretation of the "Substantially Similar" Hurdle in the Congressional Review Act: Can OSHA Ever Utter the E-Word (Ergonomics) Again?
- The Psychology of Deception: Rethinking the Excited Utterance Exception for 911 Calls
- The Color of (Juvenile) Justice: Disparate Impact and the Congressional Response to the Pandemic
- Back to the Future: Impact of Affordable Care Act on Health Equity and Risks of Backsliding in Era of New Hurdles for Obtaining Coverage and Health Care
- Finality is Not the Last Word
- Sovereign Immunity and International Arbitration in China: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back, and Three Steps Forward Again
- Banning Congressional Stock Trading: Will Congress Vote for a Bill That Prevents Them From Profiting Off Industries They Regulate to Help Restore the Country’s Faith in the Political Process?