Full Text Available

Access Repository

Note: Clicking the button above will open the full text document at the original institutional repository in a new window.

Restoring the Fair Cross-Section Guarantee of the Constitutional Right to an “Impartial Jury”: A Critical Examination of the Nebraska Court System’s Systemic Default and the Supreme Court’s January 2026 Reform of the Juror Questionnaire and Jury Data Rules

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Nebraska Law Review
Format:	Online Article RSS Article
Published:	2026
Subjects:	Law General Journal Article
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items: Restoring the Fair Cross-Section Guarantee of the Constitutional Right to an “Impartial Jury”: A Critical Examination of the Nebraska Court System’s Systemic Default and the Supreme Court’s January 2026 Reform of the Juror Questionnaire and Jury Data Rules

Quick Look
Misinformation and the Jury
Quick Look
An Upside of Originalism? Jury Size
Quick Look
The Independence and Impartiality of The Court of Arbitration for Sport
Quick Look
For women? Sex in the Supreme Court
Quick Look
Google, Sensorvault, and The Supreme Court
Quick Look
The Corpus Juris of (Alaska Native) Inherent Tribal Sovereignty
Quick Look
Information Leaking and the United States Supreme Court
Quick Look
The Dobbs Difference: the Rhetoric of Overruling in the United States Supreme Court
Quick Look
You Get the Jury You Get and You Don’t Throw a Fit
Quick Look
Do We Really Want Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justices Practicing Law? A Public Policy Critique to U.S.Supreme Court Term Limits
Quick Look
Can a U.S. Supreme Court Holding Die Without the Court Itself Administering the Coup de Grâce?
Quick Look
Too Much Sunlight: Is Supreme Court TV a Good Idea?
Quick Look
Ending the Era of Encampments: The United States Supreme Court Criminalizes Homelessness
Quick Look
The Political Commitment of the Supreme Court of Texas to Protecting Controlling Equity Owners
Quick Look
Tariff Refunds? The Supreme Court’s Decision in Learning Resources v. Trump
Quick Look
Remedying Public Disapproval of the Supreme Court: Expanding the Role of the Public Information Officer
Quick Look
United States Supreme Court 1979–1980 Term: Criminal Law Decisions
Quick Look
On the Place of Self-Defense in Public Life: A Hobbesian Critique of the Supreme Court’s Second Amendment
Quick Look
Courts of Indian Offenses, Courts of Indian Resistance
Quick Look
“Parked Under the Influence” Is Not a Crime: Why the Alaska Supreme Court’s Broad Interpretation of “Operating a Vehicle” Is Wrong
Quick Look
Application of information technology (IT) in the management of court records in the supreme court of Nigeria
Quick Look
Mr. Justice Marshall Rothstein, Supreme Court of Canada, Address to the American Bar Association, Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice
Quick Look
Courts and Social Justice
Quick Look
Sticky Science in Court